标签: docudrama

  • In der Sache J. Robert Oppenheimer

    In der Sache J. Robert Oppenheimer

    This article was first published in the April 2020 issue of <NCPA Magazine>
    Editor: Zhenzhen Cao

    “The whole damn thing was a farce, and now these people are trying to turn it into a tragedy.” That’s what atomic physicist Oppenheimer said afterward his interrogation in 1954.

    Oppenheimer is known as the father of the atomic bomb and was largely responsible for the Hiroshima atomic bomb program. In the 1940s and 1950s, the United States was losing in China and Korea, and there was a lot of domestic espionage, especially in 1953 when the Soviet Union became the first country to successfully detonate a hydrogen bomb, which brought McCarthyism to its peak. Oppenheimer, who had been lobbying Congress to control nuclear power and prevent the outbreak of nuclear war, became a natural target of suspicion throughout the country. Ten years after the bomb was dropped, he was tried by the Atomic Energy Commission in the United States, and his loyalty to the United States was questioned by everyone.

    © Arno Declair

    The main stage of the Deutsche Theater in Berlin was enormous, with only four actors sitting around a small table against a bleak white backdrop illuminated by cold light. Every question asked by the judge, as well as by the prosecution’s lawyers, was relayed down from above through speakers, and the audience could hear both the speakers and the actors’ delayed retelling.

    This type of interrogation was partly in line with the American regulations of the time, and partly a gimmick of the director to use Brecht’s “distancing effect” to make people think that the actors on stage were not the characters they were playing, but simply actors. The faces of all the actors during the interrogation are projected by a camera placed in the center of a square table on a huge curtain hanging overhead, so that the audience can still see the subtle facial expressions of the actors from the back. On the other hand, the angles were different for each camera, and sometimes the actors, similar to the ones in House of Cards, suddenly spoke off-camera, indicating that “the truth is only a matter of perspective”.

    As the interrogation progresses, the people who are connected to Oppenheimer’s life are also being involved, from his wife who committed suicide because she couldn’t stand the pressure, to his successor, Edward Teller, the “father of the hydrogen bomb”, who believes that scientists should not think too much about this problem. Although the whole play is unpredictable, for example, each actor has to appear in a very grotesque dance to electronic music, but the plot is maintained in the original Docudrama format.

    © Arno Declair

    In the second half, the set is changed from bleak white background to a living room full of books. The issues being discussed also become more complex. The content of the interrogations soon begins to slowly touch today’s society, and the content of this interrogation by playwright Heinar Kipphardt’s is in fact a prime example of the moral dilemma caused by technological advances.

    The digitisation of society, genetic research and the development of AI now create new possibilities and destructions of human races, yet the most frightening thing is that once it has begun, this process is irreversible. Especially with the precedent already set in recent years for genetically modified embryos and the rapid development of AI, let one wonders how much impact this will have on future generations.

    In order to show the contemporary and futuristic nature of the story, the director adapted the original Oppenheimer’s confession of “spiritual treason” to a more modern and abstract approach at the end of the film. Everyone sat in their chairs with sunglasses on, and the electronic music in the background (produced with artificial intelligence by composer Christoph Hart) counted down louder and louder until a bright light came out from one corner of the stage.

    © Arno Declair

    At the end of this “explosion test”, everything returned to silence and darkness. Then, from a small door, lighted robots slowly emerged, one, two, three, until they were the only one left on stage, walking around erratically, creating a cyberpunk feeling, pulling the timeline from 1950 to 2050. In the new timeline, Oppenheimer’s back is draped with feathers in Indian attire, and mankind’s centuries-old civilization returns to a barbaric society after being destroyed by the atomic bomb. Felix Goeser, who plays Oppenheimer, looks back as he exits the stage, his eyes full of disappointment for humanity.

    Brecht said, “Everything new is better than everything old”. Director Lupin, who is very fond of new technology, this time offers an unanswerable critique of the fast-moving technology, that the rigorous scientist has become a thing of the past and that “everything in the future needs to be redesigned! When these words were shouted, the stage reverted to silence, and Oppenheimer’s head was hit by a holographic projection in the spewing smoke.

    ★★★★☆

  • 关于J. Robert Oppenheimer一案

    关于J. Robert Oppenheimer一案

    关于J·罗伯特·奥本海默一事

    本文首发于2020年4月刊《NCPA杂志》
    编辑:曹珍珍

    “整个该死的过程都是一场闹剧,而现在这些人试图把它变成一场悲剧。”这正是原子物理学家奥本海默在1954年被审问后的感叹。

    奥本海默被誉为原子弹之父,大部分负责了广岛原子弹计划。20世纪40至50年代,美国在中国和朝鲜失利,国内间谍活动频繁,尤以1953年苏联成为首个成功引爆氢弹的国家为标志,麦卡锡主义达到顶峰。奥本海默一直在游说国会控制核能,防止核战争爆发,因此成为全国怀疑的天然目标。原子弹投下十年后,他被美国原子能委员会审判,人人质疑他对美国的忠诚。

    © Arno Declair

    柏林德意志剧院的主舞台极为宏大,只有四名演员围坐在一张小桌旁,背景是一片冷峻的白色幕布,冷光照射下显得格外凄清。法官和检方律师的每一个提问都是从上方通过扬声器传送,观众既能听到扬声器的声音,也能听到演员们延迟复述的回答。

    这种审讯方式部分符合当时美国的规定,部分是导演利用布莱希特的“疏离效果”的手法,让观众明白舞台上的演员并非角色本身,而仅仅是演员。审讯过程中,所有演员的面部表情都通过置于正方形桌子中央的摄像机投影到悬挂于头顶的大幕上,从后台依然可以看到演员微妙的面部动态。另一方面,每个摄像机角度不一,演员有时会突然在镜头外发言,类似美剧《纸牌屋》,暗示“真相只是视角问题”。

    随着审讯的深入,涉及奥本海默生活的人也被牵扯进来,从因压力自杀的妻子,到他的继任者,被称为“氢弹之父”的爱德华·泰勒——他认为科学家不应过分深思这些问题。虽然整部剧充满不可预料的变化,比如每位演员都要伴随电子音乐进行极端怪诞的舞蹈,但情节依旧保持原有纪录戏剧体裁。

    © Arno Declair

    下半场布景从冷清的白色背景换成满是书籍的客厅,讨论的议题也更为复杂。审讯内容很快开始触及当今社会,而该剧作家海纳·基普哈特的这场审讯,事实上是技术进步所引发道德困境的典型代表。

    社会数字化、基因研究及人工智能的发展,既创造了新机遇也带来毁灭性的风险,且最可怕的是一旦开始,这一进程不可逆转。特别是近年来基因改造胚胎和人工智能的迅猛发展,让人不禁思考对未来世代会带来多大影响。

    为了呈现故事的当代及未来感,导演在影片结尾将奥本海默原始的“精神叛国”自白转化为更现代、更抽象的表现方式。所有人戴着墨镜坐着,背景的电子音乐(由作曲家克里斯托弗·哈特利用人工智能制作)声势渐强,数秒倒计时,直到一个角落射出耀眼光芒。

    © Arno Declair

    在这场“爆炸测试”结束后,一切恢复了寂静和黑暗。随后,一扇小门缓缓打开,带灯的机器人缓缓走出,一个、两个、三个,直到他们成为舞台上唯一的存在,行为不规则,营造出赛博朋克氛围,将时间线从1950年推至2050年。新的时间线上,奥本海默背披印第安风格的羽毛装,人类历经数百年文明积淀后,在原子弹摧毁后退回野蛮社会。扮演奥本海默的费利克斯·戈泽尔走出舞台,回头望去,眼中充满了对人类的失望。

    布莱希特曾说:“一切新事物都胜过旧事物。”热爱新技术的导演鲁平这次对飞速发展的科技提出了无可回答的批判——严谨的科学家已成过去,“未来的一切都需重新设计!”当这句话被喊出,舞台陷入寂静,奥本海默的头部被喷烟中的全息投影击中。

    ★★★★☆